Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Superintendent Presents Redistricting Recommendations to the BOE
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
FEAC presents recommendations to Board of Education 11/17/09
December 8th School superintendent Dr Elizabeth Morgan will make her recommendations concerning the FEAC's proposal to the Board of Education. She can accept it as it is or make changes.
December 15th Board of Education will have a public work session regarding redistricting from 8:30 am to 11:30 am. This work session will be televised.
December 22nd Second public work session will be held from 8:30 am to 11:30 am. Also televised.
January 5th Public hearing tentatively scheduled at South High to hear from stakeholders. This will be the only public hearing unless there are so many stakeholders that the Board of Education cannot hear from all of them during the time allotted. If not, a second public hearing will be held on January 12th.
January 19th The Board of Education will take a vote on the redistricting proposal and make their final decision.
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
FEAC Meeting 11/03/09 FEAC Finalizes Recommendations to present to the Board of Education
- A petition of 97 names of Keedysville residents who opposed the proposal to send our children to Rockland Woods was presented by Keedysville/Boonsboro representative Lorraine O'Connor to Staff for them to include in the presentation to the Board of Education. Thank you to those concerned residents who went door to door to collect the signatures and those who signed this petition.
- The previous revelation that a new school being built in South County was not on the docket until 2018 came up and the recommendation was eventually passed to have the Board of Education review their capital expenditures in the CIP to raise the priority of this expansion happening due to the obvious need. I am certain that I did not word this exactly right as there was a lot of debate about how exactly to word the recommendation but that is the essence of it.
- Deputy Superintendent Boyd Michaels shared the information that they reviewed the proposal to send approximately 20 Keedysville students to Pleasant Valley instead of Rockland Woods and the school would be able to accommodate the additional students without having to add staff.
- The question about the usage of the area behind to soccer fields as a prime location for a new Boonsboro school was met with some hesitation from Executive Director of School Operations Rob Rollins who explained there were some stormwater issues as well as traffic issues that would have to be addressed and it may not serve the best needs of the school although he said when they do make the decision to look at that area for a school, all viable locations will be considered. Which led into a conversation about...
- Site selection. Recommendation to the board to get FEAC involved on the front end of site selection spurred a great deal of debate. Boyd Michaels and Rob Rollins both discussed the need for confidentiality for the selection process due to the unintended consequence of having the information shared with public, one of which would be to take away negotiating power for the real estate purchase and inflate the price. Washington County purchases the land for schools and in some cases use a third party to complete the transaction. The State of Maryland allows for meetings involving real estate selection to be closed to the general public due to the sensitivity of the information.
- The magnet program at Boonsboro sparked a great deal of heated debate. FEAC CoChair Adam Lewis held fast to the belief that if you take the program out of Boonsboro, several of the parents would follow the program giving voluntary relief to the school. Lorraine O'Connor disputed that and referred back to the recommendation made a couple of years ago which led to outrage from the community. FEAC committee member Bert Iseminger agreed with Lorraine and said he was against taking away such an important program from any school and felt test scores would suffer as a result. A vote was held and the motion to recommend to the BOE to consider removing the magnet program for further relief of Boonsboro passed with only Lorraine O'Connor and Bert Iseminger voting against the proposal.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
FEAC Meeting 10/27/09 Good News
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
FEAC Meeting 10/13/09 Time is Running Out
- There was discussion at the beginning of the meeting regarding communication the FEAC received from Senator Munson's Office and Senator Barbara Mikulski. A comment was made that the matter was out of their jurisdiction.
- Misty Roosa from Keedysville was mentioned in reference to a letter that was not responded to. They said an apology letter has been sent but said that according to their records, Dr Spong did respond to her questions. They also referenced a question from Michelle Green that they were still unsure as to whether or not it had been responded to.
- A motion was made by Kira Hamman to set aside time in each FEAC meeting to answer questions from stakeholders who were present. Lorraine O Conner (representative from Keedysville and Cannon Ridge resident) was very vocal to say that it was not necessary or appropriate and that the stakeholders had their opportunity to send letters and address the FEAC at the public forums. She stated that the same concerns were repeated over and over and that she had even been approached at the bus stop that very morning by concerned parents. FEAC Co Chair Adam Lewis and committee member Bert Iseminger both verbally said they had no problem with it but when it came to a vote, the only person that supported it was Kira who made the initial motion. Once again I am very disappointed in the committee and our representative Lorraine O Conner for the lack of courage to engage the stakeholders in an open discussion. Although the meetings are public, they accept written statements from stakeholders and, in the case of the FEAC forums, they have listened to stakeholders statements, they have never directly answered questions from the stakeholders, preferring instead to issue written response, most of which are prepared by Staff.
- The question of sending some students to Pleasant Valley came up again. It is a possibility that up to twenty students could be sent from Boonsboro to Pleasant Valley without adding personnel or portables.
- The magnet school system was discussed at length. Ultimately it appeared to be decided that removing the magnet program from Boonsboro (and other schools) would be a detriment because it would cause a different fight and hurt the affected schools.
- A committee member asked if there would be a liberal policy about exceptions to the redistricting. The response was rising fifth graders would be exempt. Other than that, it would be on a case by case business although it was also stated that most principals would choose to say no to all request so they would not have to pick and choose.
- They voted on some of the sections of the proposal focusing on the areas that showed little or no opposition.
- When the FEAC makes its recommendation, they will present it simultaneously to the Superintendent and the Board of Education. The Superintendent has the option to make changes to the proposal before she presents it to the Board of Education. The Board of Education then votes and makes the final decision.
- The last twenty minutes of the meeting were basically bickering about the impending deadline and what would be the best way to proceed. An additional meeting was added since most members did not feel they would be able to complete it as planned at the next meeting. The FEAC Committee can submit their recommendation with caveats (i.e. here is the best we can come up with although the stakeholders strongly disagree) and they can also roll out their recommendation in stages as long as future recommendations do not contradict previous recommendations.
- There was a lot of discussion about other schools that would be affected by the redistricting but this blog is focused on the Boonsboro/Keedysville Community. If you are interested in those areas, please watch the Herald-Mail who was represented at the meeting or better yet, make arrangements to attend the meetings whenever possible. They are open to the public.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
School Board Approves new Eastern Primary School
10/08/2008
Plans approved for new Eastern Primary school in Hagerstown
By ERIN CUNNINGHAM
erinc@herald-mail.com
HAGERSTOWN — Plans for a new $22.2 million primary school across the street from Eastern Elementary School were approved Tuesday.
The Washington County Board of Education voted 5-0 in support of designs for the school that could enroll up to 620 students in prekindergarten through second grade and open in 2011. School Board members Ruth Anne Callaham and Bernadette M. Wagner were absent for the vote.
A new Eastern Primary School is one of five schools, including a new high school in Hagerstown's east end, that are being considered for construction in Washington County over the next six years at a total cost of $158 million. State money for Eastern Primary and other projects will be requested for the 2010 fiscal year.
The designs for Eastern Primary show a single-story, 77,523-square-foot building will be built on about 20 acres off Yale Drive. The design was prepared by Gilbert Architects Inc., based in Owings Mills, Md.
Rob Rollins, acting executive director for school operations, said the design is similar to three recently completed schools: Maugansville, Pangborn and Rockland Woods elementary.
Robert Spong, facilities planning manager, said the design documents approved by the school board Tuesday will be sent to state and Washington County officials for approval. Spong said he expected comments from county officials concerned about traffic patterns and intersections near Eastern Primary, which is to be built off Mount Aetna Road, near the new Washington County Medical Center site.
Board Vice President Donna Brightman said she'd like to see some flexibility with the design so older children could attend school there in the future if necessary.
Officials said that was possible by expanding on the planned wings of the building.
Preliminary plans call for construction beginning about one year from now and ending in April 2011.